Top selling and most demanded Domains, for sell at $200 sedo,comhttps://t.co/FruCxXGE0Y https://t.co/cZkAQ3gr7W https://t.co/OeT3jnqhx8https://t.co/Rh4eFJympv https://t.co/7Q5f7coZ3bhttps://t.co/UYgb6fc8kC#howCanIselldomain pic.twitter.com/0laRk7dheL
— Easy Domain (@Easy_Domain) May 14, 2023
Showing posts with label Montenegro and FYR Macedonia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Montenegro and FYR Macedonia. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Recasting Serbia’s Image, Starting With a Fresh Face
THE public face of Serbia for years has been that of a wizened war criminal in the dock in The Hague. Now, as the once-outcast country presses for membership in the European Union, it is increasingly represented by the gap-toothed grin of its energetic young foreign minister, Vuk Jeremic, all of 34 and a graduate of Cambridge and Harvard.
It is not just appearances. He is a minister in the most westward-leaning government Serbia has ever had, one that is aggressively pursuing membership in the European Union and good relations with the United States. Yet at the top of his agenda stands the issue that brought so much trouble to Serbia: the breakaway province and self-declared nation of Kosovo.
To the consternation of powerful supporters of Kosovo’s independence, including the United States, the Serbian obsession runs much deeper than a handful of ultranationalists from the generation of Slobodan Milosevic. Even young liberals like Mr. Jeremic, whose fluent English sounds more Bronxville than Belgrade, cannot let go of Kosovo, though it could endanger Serbia’s chance to move beyond its recent troubled past.
“The fact that this kind of fervent, pro-European politician in Serbia happens to have this position on Kosovo confuses a lot of people,” Mr. Jeremic said in an interview on the eve of the Orthodox Christmas here last week.
“This place, Kosovo, is our Jerusalem; you just can’t treat it any other way than our Jerusalem,” he said.
As if to underscore the point, his mentor and psychology teacher two decades ago at the First Belgrade High School, the current Serbian president, Boris Tadic, spent the holiday at the Visoki Decani monastery in Kosovo, under guard amid protests by local ethnic Albanians.
Mr. Jeremic quickly added that Serbia was not pressing its case through the use of arms, directly or in the form of paramilitary groups, but through institutions like the International Court of Justice, which will rule on the manner in which Kosovo declared independence. But the stakes are different, with vastly improved relations with the European Union and an end to Serbia’s isolation on the line.
Mr. Jeremic is at pains to explain to Western audiences that Serbia’s reputation from the Milosevic years had overshadowed the reality that it is now a democracy, and one whose voters twice chose pro-Western candidates in the presidential and parliamentary elections in 2008 — despite the inflamed nationalist sentiment in the wake of Kosovo’s secession.
He was appointed foreign minister at 31, too young and inexperienced in the eyes of many Serbs to be trusted with their most important national issue — the impending secession of Kosovo. Yet, he has fought hard for Kosovo, lobbying governments around the world against recognizing its independence and becoming along the way one of Serbia’s most popular politicians.
Mr. Jeremic’s stridency on Kosovo has led his opponents to charge that he was a closet nationalist, talking one line when he was abroad and quite a different one at home in the Balkans. “Personally, I don’t think I’m a nationalist,” he said. “I’m half Bosnian and half Serb.”
Mr. Jeremic’s great-grandfather on his mother’s side was Nurija Pozderac, a prominent Muslim politician before World War II who joined Tito’s Partisans to fight the Nazis and was killed in 1943. His paternal grandfather was an officer in the king’s army and spent much of the war as a prisoner at Dachau. Once he was liberated by the Allies, he returned to Serbia on foot, Mr. Jeremic said.
HE described a normal childhood in Belgrade, including a close relationship with his psychology teacher, Mr. Tadic. But his father, who worked for the state-owned oil company, and his mother went into exile after running afoul of the regime, and Mr. Jeremic finished high school in London before moving on to Cambridge, where he studied theoretical physics.
His time at Cambridge, which coincided with the war in Bosnia, helped him to understand Serbia’s image abroad in a very personal way. “It was hard to explain that you come from Serbia and you’re not a children-eating radical,” said Mr. Jeremic, who had family members fighting on both sides of the war in Bosnia.
Mr. Jeremic opposed the regime of Mr. Milosevic and was a founder of the Organization of Serbian Students Abroad in 1997, but it was during the NATO bombing of Serbia that he hardened his resolve to work for his country. He said he had high school friends who were also opposed to Mr. Milosevic’s reign but were called up for compulsory army service at the time of the airstrikes in 1999. Once they were wearing their uniforms, they were “legitimate targets,” as he put it ruefully, and some were killed.
He recalled thinking at the time: “This regime, this government, this guy, Slobodan Milosevic, he has to be removed, because he’s going to get us all buried. If he stays, he’s going to get us all buried.”
Mr. Jeremic traveled to Serbia to support the student movement there, known as Otpor, the Serbian word for resistance. After Mr. Milosevic’s ouster Mr. Jeremic followed Mr. Tadic through a succession of ministries as an adviser, taking a break for a degree from Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, before himself becoming foreign minister.
With Serbia’s scant resources and tattered public image, his options for fighting the diplomatic might of countries supporting Kosovo, like the United States, Germany and Britain, seemed limited. But Mr. Jeremic, who still looks and sounds a bit like an overachieving college class president, turned himself into a one-man road show, traveling to 90 countries in the two years since becoming foreign minister. Last year alone he spent 700 hours in the air, or roughly 29 days, much of that in a 30-year-old French-built Falcon 50 jet that was bought for Tito.
MR. JEREMIC sees his age, which many consider a weakness, as one of his assets. “When you’re young, and when you come and they see you for the first time, a lot of them are just kind of surprised. They say, ‘Who’s this kid?’
“That’s actually a good thing because it opens up their minds. They’re curious. They want to hear what you have to say to them because you’re different,” he said. An afternoon with Mr. Jeremic, whose wife, Natasa Lekic, is a news anchor on Serbian public television, is a pleasant but intense experience, not complete without a glass of Serbian Carigrad red wine and a stream of articulate defenses of the country’s claim to Kosovo.
Smoking a cigar and sipping his wine, Mr. Jeremic refused to say what Serbia would demand if it managed to force Kosovo back to the negotiating table by winning its case before the International Court of Justice. He insisted that the mistake the United States and its allies made before Kosovo’s declaration was dictating rather than discussing terms.
Their other big mistake, he said, was expecting Serbia simply to acquiesce to the loss of the province, cowed in the face of American and Western European recognition for Kosovo. “This energy we invested, you know, in going around the world, has surprised a lot of people,” Mr. Jeremic said. “A lot of people didn’t expect us to dare to try.”
Source:nytimes.com/
Bringing Croatia and Serbia together
The election of a new Croatian president, Ivo Josipovic – who defeated the mayor of Zagreb, Milan Bandic, in a second round run-off – is likely to contribute to a thaw in relations with neighbours Serbia. Aside from a much-lauded commitment to fight corruption and organised crime, Josipovic's early remarks reveal a constructive and pragmatic approach to the issues that have plagued ties between the two countries; particularly when contrasted with those of the man he will succeed as president, Stjepan Mesic.
In spite of Josipovic's refreshing stance, however, a number of obstacles remain that will continue to complicate matters, despite the expressed good intentions of both sides. During the final gasps of Mesic's second five-year term, relations between the two have sunk to their lowest ebb since Croatia recognized Kosovo's unilateral declaration of independence in March 2008.
A recent visit to Kosovo by Mesic (which was initially timed to coincide with Orthodox Christmas, but eventually shifted by a day), where he talked about the "new reality" of Kosovo's independence and called for further recognitions, caused consternation in Serbia, whose government has consistently called on countries to refrain from such comments while the International Court of Justice (ICJ) considers its verdict on the legality of Kosovo's declaration. In the same period, Mesic reduced the sentence handed down to Sinisa Rimac, a former Croatian police officer, who was convicted of killing 23 ethnic Serb civilians in Croatia in 1991: a decision that Serbia's president, Boris Tadic, condemned as an "anti-European and anti-civilisational gesture which cannot be justified by any means".
Josipovic's description of relations between Croatia and Serbia as "a strategic priority", however, provides an important opportunity for renewed progress. Part of this pragmatism derives from Croatia's deteriorating economic position (its economy is believed to have contracted by around 5% in 2009), with Josipovic emphasising how "co-operation with our neighbours is also important for our economy, because we are mainly exporting to these states... [and] we are expecting the arrival of new tourists too".
A number of key impediments remain, however, particularly concerning the mutual claims for genocide before the ICJ, with Croatia having filed a case, co-authored by Josipovic, in 1999 and Serbia responding with a countersuit earlier this year. These lawsuits have been deemed a setback in efforts to establish good neighbourly relations, a key element of the region's bid for membership of the EU. Immediately upon his election triumph, however, Josipovic publicly discussed the possibility of dropping Croatia's genocide case, in order to "see whether certain problems and obstacles can be resolved without lawsuits". Josipovic – who stated that many Croatian citizens "have certain unrealistic expectations about the lawsuit" – has instead proposed to "negotiate with Belgrade about missing persons, war crimes trials and the return of cultural treasures".
Dropping the respective cases would create the political and diplomatic space to attend to other issues, including those of "former and current refugees, the processing of war crimes, the exhumation and identification of the missing, the return of displaced persons, compensation for destroyed and seized property, a comprehensive solution for tenants' rights and the regulation of unpaid pensions". In tandem, the EU must invest some of its considerable leverage – as it has done in the battles against organised crime and corruption – to ensure that both Croatia and Serbia contend with the tangible legacies of the 1990s: legacies that despite afflicting the daily lives of hundreds of thousands have regularly been denied the recognition they deserve.
While the issue of Kosovo will remain a source of lingering discord, the early signs suggest that Josipovic will contribute to a much-needed improvement in relations between Serbia and Croatia. A plethora of challenges remain, however, to ensure that any improvement in ties has tangible benefits for those citizens afflicted by previous antagonisms. Such commitments to good neighbourly relations, rhetorically at least, will continue to rival anti-corruption as the "new nationalism" of the Balkans.
Source:guardian.co.uk/
In spite of Josipovic's refreshing stance, however, a number of obstacles remain that will continue to complicate matters, despite the expressed good intentions of both sides. During the final gasps of Mesic's second five-year term, relations between the two have sunk to their lowest ebb since Croatia recognized Kosovo's unilateral declaration of independence in March 2008.
A recent visit to Kosovo by Mesic (which was initially timed to coincide with Orthodox Christmas, but eventually shifted by a day), where he talked about the "new reality" of Kosovo's independence and called for further recognitions, caused consternation in Serbia, whose government has consistently called on countries to refrain from such comments while the International Court of Justice (ICJ) considers its verdict on the legality of Kosovo's declaration. In the same period, Mesic reduced the sentence handed down to Sinisa Rimac, a former Croatian police officer, who was convicted of killing 23 ethnic Serb civilians in Croatia in 1991: a decision that Serbia's president, Boris Tadic, condemned as an "anti-European and anti-civilisational gesture which cannot be justified by any means".
Josipovic's description of relations between Croatia and Serbia as "a strategic priority", however, provides an important opportunity for renewed progress. Part of this pragmatism derives from Croatia's deteriorating economic position (its economy is believed to have contracted by around 5% in 2009), with Josipovic emphasising how "co-operation with our neighbours is also important for our economy, because we are mainly exporting to these states... [and] we are expecting the arrival of new tourists too".
A number of key impediments remain, however, particularly concerning the mutual claims for genocide before the ICJ, with Croatia having filed a case, co-authored by Josipovic, in 1999 and Serbia responding with a countersuit earlier this year. These lawsuits have been deemed a setback in efforts to establish good neighbourly relations, a key element of the region's bid for membership of the EU. Immediately upon his election triumph, however, Josipovic publicly discussed the possibility of dropping Croatia's genocide case, in order to "see whether certain problems and obstacles can be resolved without lawsuits". Josipovic – who stated that many Croatian citizens "have certain unrealistic expectations about the lawsuit" – has instead proposed to "negotiate with Belgrade about missing persons, war crimes trials and the return of cultural treasures".
Dropping the respective cases would create the political and diplomatic space to attend to other issues, including those of "former and current refugees, the processing of war crimes, the exhumation and identification of the missing, the return of displaced persons, compensation for destroyed and seized property, a comprehensive solution for tenants' rights and the regulation of unpaid pensions". In tandem, the EU must invest some of its considerable leverage – as it has done in the battles against organised crime and corruption – to ensure that both Croatia and Serbia contend with the tangible legacies of the 1990s: legacies that despite afflicting the daily lives of hundreds of thousands have regularly been denied the recognition they deserve.
While the issue of Kosovo will remain a source of lingering discord, the early signs suggest that Josipovic will contribute to a much-needed improvement in relations between Serbia and Croatia. A plethora of challenges remain, however, to ensure that any improvement in ties has tangible benefits for those citizens afflicted by previous antagonisms. Such commitments to good neighbourly relations, rhetorically at least, will continue to rival anti-corruption as the "new nationalism" of the Balkans.
Source:guardian.co.uk/
Serbia formally applies for EU membership
On 22 December 2009 Serbia submitted a formal application for membership of the EU. Serbian President Boris Tadic handed his country's application for EU membership to Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt in Stockholm.
"I welcome this historic step for Serbia. It reflects the Serbian government's strong determination and the broad popular support for EU membership. A Serbian membership is important not just for Serbia, but for the region as a whole. This is an important addition to the EU family", said Fredrik Reinfeldt at a press conference.
"This is an historic day for my country. It is the tenth year of democratic life, ten years after the end of the war, ten years after the end of our isolation. During these ten years, our main goal has been to bring Serbia into the EU. Now we will continue with the reform work in the hope of becoming a full EU member in a few years' time", said Boris Tadic.
Olli Rehn, the outgoing European Commissioner for EU enlargement, also attended the press conference. He noted that Serbia had come a long way over the past ten years: "I speak on the behalf of the entire European Commission when I say that the Commission is looking forward to working with Serbia. Serbia is a key country on the Western Balkans and we can now see that the whole region is moving closer to the EU. This is important from a peace-keeping point of view and to the future of Europe".
Source:lexology.com/l
"I welcome this historic step for Serbia. It reflects the Serbian government's strong determination and the broad popular support for EU membership. A Serbian membership is important not just for Serbia, but for the region as a whole. This is an important addition to the EU family", said Fredrik Reinfeldt at a press conference.
"This is an historic day for my country. It is the tenth year of democratic life, ten years after the end of the war, ten years after the end of our isolation. During these ten years, our main goal has been to bring Serbia into the EU. Now we will continue with the reform work in the hope of becoming a full EU member in a few years' time", said Boris Tadic.
Olli Rehn, the outgoing European Commissioner for EU enlargement, also attended the press conference. He noted that Serbia had come a long way over the past ten years: "I speak on the behalf of the entire European Commission when I say that the Commission is looking forward to working with Serbia. Serbia is a key country on the Western Balkans and we can now see that the whole region is moving closer to the EU. This is important from a peace-keeping point of view and to the future of Europe".
Source:lexology.com/l
Top Seeds Advance To Australian Open Second Round
Top seeds Roger Federer and Serena Williams took contrasting paths into the second round of the Australian Open tennis tournament Tuesday.
Three-time champion Federer overcame a spirited challenge from world No. 37 Russia's Igor Andreev in the men's grueling first round with a 4-6, 6-2, 7-6(2), 6-0 win.
The Swiss, who is seeking a record-extending 16th major championship in Melbourne, had to fight off three set points in the third set before winding up the match in two hours and 44 minutes.
Defending women's champion Williams, playing her first Grand Slam match since her outburst at the US Open, routed Polish teenager Urszula Radwanska 6-2, 6-1.
Radwanska, however, gave a tough fight to Williams keeping her on the court for 73 minutes.
With this, the 28-year-old American improved the record of not losing in any of the 41 Grand Slam first-round matches she played so far.
Her sister, sixth-seeded Venus Williams, too did not face much resistance in the first round match against Lucie Safarova of the Czech Republic, winning in straight sets: 6-2, 6-2.
None of the other seeded women who took to the court Tuesday faced any upset. No. 8 Jelena Jankovic of Serbia, No. 11 Marion Bartoli of France, No. 13 Samantha Stosur of Australia, 19th seed Nadia Petrova of Russia, and No. 20 Ana Ivanovic of Serbia advanced to the next stage.
Three seeded players in the men's section were eliminated in the first round Tuesday.
Eighth-seeded Robin Soderling, who is also last year's French Open runner-up, became the highest men's seed to see an early exit, losing a five-set match. No.16 Tommy Robredo of Spain and 25th-seeded Sam Querrey of the US also crashed out of the major season opener.
In an extraordinarily well-played match on Rod Laver Arena, veteran Lleyton Hewitt of Australia eased past Brazilian Ricardo Hocevar 6-1, 6-2, 6-3 in the first round.
Nikolay Davydenko of Russia, Novak Djokovic of Serbia, Fernando Verdasco of Spain, Gael Monfils of France, and Marin Cilic of Croatia were the other prominent winners in the men's section.
Second round matches start Wednesday.
Source:rttnews.com/
Three-time champion Federer overcame a spirited challenge from world No. 37 Russia's Igor Andreev in the men's grueling first round with a 4-6, 6-2, 7-6(2), 6-0 win.
The Swiss, who is seeking a record-extending 16th major championship in Melbourne, had to fight off three set points in the third set before winding up the match in two hours and 44 minutes.
Defending women's champion Williams, playing her first Grand Slam match since her outburst at the US Open, routed Polish teenager Urszula Radwanska 6-2, 6-1.
Radwanska, however, gave a tough fight to Williams keeping her on the court for 73 minutes.
With this, the 28-year-old American improved the record of not losing in any of the 41 Grand Slam first-round matches she played so far.
Her sister, sixth-seeded Venus Williams, too did not face much resistance in the first round match against Lucie Safarova of the Czech Republic, winning in straight sets: 6-2, 6-2.
None of the other seeded women who took to the court Tuesday faced any upset. No. 8 Jelena Jankovic of Serbia, No. 11 Marion Bartoli of France, No. 13 Samantha Stosur of Australia, 19th seed Nadia Petrova of Russia, and No. 20 Ana Ivanovic of Serbia advanced to the next stage.
Three seeded players in the men's section were eliminated in the first round Tuesday.
Eighth-seeded Robin Soderling, who is also last year's French Open runner-up, became the highest men's seed to see an early exit, losing a five-set match. No.16 Tommy Robredo of Spain and 25th-seeded Sam Querrey of the US also crashed out of the major season opener.
In an extraordinarily well-played match on Rod Laver Arena, veteran Lleyton Hewitt of Australia eased past Brazilian Ricardo Hocevar 6-1, 6-2, 6-3 in the first round.
Nikolay Davydenko of Russia, Novak Djokovic of Serbia, Fernando Verdasco of Spain, Gael Monfils of France, and Marin Cilic of Croatia were the other prominent winners in the men's section.
Second round matches start Wednesday.
Source:rttnews.com/
Saturday, November 28, 2009
European Parliament OKs visa-free travel for Serbia, Montenegro and FYR Macedonia
The European Parliament has adopted a decision to allow citizens of Serbia, Montenegro and FYR Macedonia to travel visa-free to the bloc as of Dec.19, while calling for visa liberalization for the citizens of Albania and Bosnia-Herzegovina by next year.
The Parliament also recommended starting similar visa dialogue with Kosovo.
On Nov. 30, the EU Council is expected to approve the decision, which will waive visa requirements in Serbia, Montenegro and FYROM for stays of less than 90 days in EU countries, excluding the UK and Ireland.
Visa liberalization is a step towards eventual EU membership.
The EU's executive arm had previously proposed a visa-free regime for those three Balkan countries, but Albania and Bosnia did not qualify.
"Albania and Bosnia and Herzegovina must catch up on the reforms needed to qualify for a short-stay visa waiver," the Parliament said, calling on the EC to report on the two countries' progress early in 2010.
Source:balkans.com
The Parliament also recommended starting similar visa dialogue with Kosovo.
On Nov. 30, the EU Council is expected to approve the decision, which will waive visa requirements in Serbia, Montenegro and FYROM for stays of less than 90 days in EU countries, excluding the UK and Ireland.
Visa liberalization is a step towards eventual EU membership.
The EU's executive arm had previously proposed a visa-free regime for those three Balkan countries, but Albania and Bosnia did not qualify.
"Albania and Bosnia and Herzegovina must catch up on the reforms needed to qualify for a short-stay visa waiver," the Parliament said, calling on the EC to report on the two countries' progress early in 2010.
Source:balkans.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
